Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Bernie Voters & the Sanjay Effect

"We are going to make America great again."

The election results of 2016 were unexpected by pollsters, analysts, and most talking heads.  Republican voters rallied around their nominee in big numbers in Florida, Ohio, and Michigan.  Who were they and what was their motive?  How did fundamentalists Christians support a self-admitted p**** grabber?  Is the Sanjay-effect a measurable political force?  When Secretary Hillary Clinton did not name Bernie Sanders as her running mate, did she seal her electoral fate?

Sanjaya Malakar was a contestant on a television show called American Idol who was propelled past his talent level into the finals by a following, set upon destroying the show's credibility.  Well known shock-jock Howard Stern actively encouraged millions of listeners to hijack the faux election and support the worst candidate.  These malcontents are a wandering bunch who attack institutions they perceive as non-democratic.  Portions of this same group named a boat in Europe "Boaty McBoatface." When some people witness opportunities to disrupt voting systems, social networks provide them the opportunity to band together with others to pose as a strike-back force.

Bernie Sanders voters were commonly heard as expressing sentiments of the disenfranchised.  Many claimed that they'd rather vote Trump, or stay home, than vote for Secretary Clinton.  The Secretary did not choose Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, or anyone that these voters could rally behind.  The electoral results were dramatic and overwhelming.

President-elect Trump was supported by a vast number of people who wanted an outsider, a business person, a non-politician who was going to 'mix things up!'  These supporters united behind a populous message, and saw this candidate as a cruise missile to our democratic system.  Fundamentalists Christians likely found themselves voting straight party ticket, rather than for person who looked at a 10-year old and said, "I'll be dating her in ten years."  However, the result was the same.

Democrats missed the opportunity to unite the disenfranchised when the Democratic nominee left Bernie voters without a viable option.  That said, this was a 'republic' result, not a 'democratic' one.  Secretary Clinton won the popular vote.  The electoral college is a relic of age long since past, and should either be employed now, today, more than ever, or abolished.  President-elect Trump said, "these elections are rigged, and that this electoral college system is bad for democracy."  I could not agree more.  Social media has given candidates direct access to their voters.  No longer are candidates required to hold public rallies.  They can tweet at 3 am and reach millions of potential voters across congressional and state lines.

The protests erupting nationwide over these election result lead me to wonder, what might have happened had those people been this active before the election?  These results, however un-democratic, came after a contest we all agreed to take part in, knowing full well that a majority of Americans might not get their way.  These protests would serve us all best, if they focused of amending our election laws to insure this will never happen again.


Saturday, March 19, 2016

Democratic Party Convention Rules Amendment

Our primary election systems are flawed, in so many ways.  The inconsistency and variability between dates and types is mind boggling and without seeming reason other than to cause confusion and voter suppression.  The problem lies in the formation and articulation of the rules that bind and guide our party's actions.

Neither party's platform nor its actions regard voter intention highly or well.  Nominees might be chosen by delete, super delegates, who may vote in the second round of balloting any way they see fit.  The will of the voters, a majority of the party's loyalists, and the democratic process seems tainted by this bloated theocracy of brokering delegates.

While some states partition delegates, the ultimate winner at each convention is still a winner take all event.  One candidate is awarded both the Presidential nomination and the opportunity to name a Vice Presidential nominee, often leaving the losers in the primary without a candidate to support in the general election.

In order to unite the party, insure a general election victory, a restore democratic principles to the Democratic Party Convention system, I offer this amendment:

"The Presidential nominee receiving the second most delegates shall be named to the Vice President position, on the general election ballot."


Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Snow-nadoes

“If you listen to the hysterics …, you would think that the Statue of Liberty will shortly be under water and the polar bears are all drowning, and that we’re dying from pollution. It’s absolutely and utterly untrue.”

When Republicans spout such non-sense Democrats should point to people who have already been forced to relocate due to rising ocean waters.   Alaskans and and entire nation of the Kiribati have had to move to higher ground.  That Rand Paul finds such truisms hysterical is the sad reality of the republican party, is its complete disconnection from it.  Without a doubt, industrialized pollution is the leading cause of cancer in America today.  Corporations might be people, but they are the exact definition of a psychopath bent only on their own enrichment, without regard for anything else.  

The world is changing, and rapidly so.  As a child, I went through many tornado drills, during the springtime.  As I grew up in the greater North Texas area, I lived in the middle souther third of what was known as tornado alley.  Most tornados occurred here, Oklahoma, Kansas and lower parts of Nebraska, again during the storm season.  Tornados are becoming more widespread and occur with greater frequency in places outside of what was once their mainstay.  Although I have never heard the phrase on any weather broadcast ever, I predict we will soon hear of a "snow-nado."  I count ever bit as likely as a tornado in Vermont, which happened already.

Global climate change is happening, whether man-made or some type of millennial super-cycle the Earth does, things are not as they once were, and if we can not evolve we will all suffer, the poor and the rich alike.  

We've heard of the "polar vortex" and "snowpocalypse" but these are really just new words for blizzards or cold snaps.  Then again, in my youth I can hardly remember El Nino being anything associated with weather.  Last week, El Nino caused 30 foot breakers up and down the coast of California, where natives claimed to have never seen such oceanic activity in all the decades they lived there.

Republicans seem resolved to go down with the ship, denying that they are sinking the entire way.  

Thursday, August 20, 2015

Religious Right's Rights

"The Supreme Court now demands that religious people engage in conduct that seriously violates their beliefs."

Yes, so long as those beliefs are held in some sort of blind faith, instead of science...absolutely.  You may not, in the name of your religion, deny a person the benefit of blood, organ, or tissue donation simply because you personally believe that such acts are ungodly or might transfer evil from one to another.  Just because you pay monthly premiums, does not give you the right to decide what procedure(s) a doctor recommends or provides to another patient!  Your beliefs have no standing in the halls of medicine and science.

Another point to consider is the origin of these beliefs...it is the Bible, specifically the Old Testament. Therein you'll find all sorts of laws and rules.  Some of which to most might seem arcane, yet some still cling to them as though they were codified god-law.   I mean if you like bacon, pork chops, ribs, shrimp, crab, lobster, or catfish, then stay out of the Old Testament!  You aren't even allowed to cook your corn or potatoes with butter thereon?!  And did you know that you are supposed to leave the corners of your field for the weird?  I can assure you that any weirdos wandering the corners of fields through the Bible Belt would be shot on sight!

My point is that the Bible, or any other religious doctrine, isn't a cafeteria bar from the ancient past that you get to pick and choose which dish you will offend to non-believers with today.  The Bible is for you to consume at your leisure, for you.

You have the right to do with your life as you please...that's it and no more.  You don't need to personally agree with someone else's life choices to prepare them a hamburger, rent them a room, serve them pie at a counter, or bake them a wedding cake.

It is restrictive of interstate commerce to use your personal or religious biases to decide which patrons you will provide services you and won't.  Imagine yourself, a pilgrim in an unholy land, unable to procure food, gas, or hotel services all because you openly prefer bacon-burgers and buttery popcorn?


Tuesday, June 2, 2015

A New Way of Campaigning

"You can't get money out of politics."

Well, I say, if we can not get it out, then we should put it to good use. I am encouraging all progressive, forward-thinking, politicians to stop printing yard placards, brochures, bumper stickers, buttons, and for humanity's sake STOP paying for media advertisements. These benefit society naught. I suggest we take another tact, and send the money directly into the district or state the candidate is running.

Instead of running an ad in a particular county with donations, you build a park, repair a road, paint a crosswalk, and take special consideration to query local supporters and municipalities for their feedback as to what that community or county really needs. In this way, things get better just from running for office, so that even if you do not win, things are improved because of your campaign efforts. If you are absolutely compelled to spend money embossing your name on things, it should be for big projects like schools, hospitals, and bridges. There really is no project too large so long as it has campaign support.

When enough works have been done, the people will see them and elect you, and if not we will have improved the campaign district anyway...

It is time to change the status quo, money has become far too corruptive an influence to allow it unfettered access into our legislative halls.  Let us redirect the billions of dollars tossed about in fits mudslinging to actual productive ends?

Friday, March 20, 2015

Republican Constitutional Violations

“I wanted to make sure,” Boehner later explained on Fox News, “there was no interference.”

Speaker of the House, Representative John Boehner, invited Prime Minister of Israel to address Congress.   Benjamin Netanyahu accepted the offer, and addressed Congress on March 3, 2015.  The White House would say only that this was breaking with protocol.  For a party that heralds Constitutional standards at every given opportunity, that no one has yet addressed GOP violations of Article II, Section 3, Clause 4, both stuns and appalls me.

"The President shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he/she shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he/she may adjourn them to such Time as he/she shall think proper; he/she shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he/she shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States."

Nowhere in Article I, will one find that Congress has any duty or authority to receive foreign dignitaries.  This is an explicitly enumerated duty of the executive, wherein Speaker Boehner has trespassed.  So, where's the lawsuit, removal from office procedures, censure of Congress?  Where's ANY mention of this violation on political shows, radio, TV, or otherwise?

I argue no such story or argument exists because liberals just don't think this way.  We tend to first not offend, and accusing republicans of undermining the President is a very strong claim.  Sure there has been scores of useless attempts to undermine his signature legislation, making this Congress the least productive in our nation's history, but that doesn't mean anything, right??

Liberal Democrats and progressives alike need to stand up, and say what is happening here...

Speaker John Boehner and his Republican Congressional backers are undermining our Constitution, and thus the Country.  They should be brought up on charges and dismissed from office.




Monday, August 18, 2014

Racial Injustice and Inequality

"All men are created equal."

To be honest, I have never really fully appreciated that phrase.  First of all it excludes women.  I am pretty sure the word "human" existed back then, so why did they use the term "men"...?  It is because they were men, who had power, who were literally otherizing anyone who was not them.  Black men, weren't, and neither were women.  They never have been, and today they still are not equal to men.

White men don't normally get shot while they are unarmed in the street.  They are usually arrested, taken to jail, where they bond out before going to court to resolve the issue.  In Ferguson, Missouri protesters weren't arrested, they are driven away with tear gas and rubber bullets.  Instead of peacefully arresting protestors who violated curfew, they were physically assaulted by SWAT teams.

The problem is that this is not a peacefully sit-in styled protest.  A few of these protesters have used this as an opportunity to cause chaos and violence.  This gives state officials reason to use excessive force, only raising the levels of tension and anger between citizens and their government.

The problem seems to be that the the people of Ferguson do not feel adequately represented by their officials.  Moreover, the escalation of violence on both sides does not seem to be easing tensions.

What is needed is for cooler heads to prevail, for those willing to be arrested for civil disobedience, to do so peacefully, so that their cases are heard in court.

My biggest questions are for those who have previous railed against government violence against citizens, and stoking fears of martial law.  Well, we have it in Ferguson Missouri.  People are not fee to roam the streets of their own town, under the threat of physical violence and arrest.  So, why aren't Tea Party Loyalists supporting the rights of these protesters!?  They are actually under threat of real physical violence and fully enforced martial law.